Date of Award

Spring 2016

Degree Type

Honors Project

School

College of Liberal Arts

First Advisor

Ryan LeCount

Abstract

Birth order is an extensively studied and contested concept in social science research. It has been used to examine topics such as personality (Curtis and Donald, 1993; Harris, 2000; Krueger et al., 2000), risk-taking behavior (Krause et al., 2014; Piliavin and Charng, 1990), context-specific learning (Harris, 2000), relationships (Eckstein et al., 2010; Harris, 2000; Kalliopuska, 1984; Manaster, 1977; Maner and Gaillot, 2007; Radley and Kennedy, 1995; Salmon, 2003; Winterich et al, 2009), narcissism (Curtis and Donald, 1993), and prosociality (Kalliopuska, 1984; Krueger et al., 2000; Kurzban et al. 2015; Maner and Gaillot, 2007; Piliavin and Charng, 1990; Radley and Kennedy, 1995; Salmon, 2003; Simmons, 1991; Warneken and Tomasello, 2009; Winterich et al, 2009). While there has been a considerable amount of research done on birth order, there has been little to no research that has examined the influence of birth order on altruistic attitudes. Previous research on prosocial behavior has shown that middle borns are likely to express less positive attitudes toward family than first borns or last borns (Salmon, 2003), and oldest children are more likely to express helping behavior toward kin than nonkin (Maner and Gailliot, 2007). The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of birth order on a person’s attitudes towards altruism. Analyses evaluated different factors in altruistic attitudes, such as risk taking, family size, gender, and rewards. Results indicated that birth order does have an effect on certain attitude measures of altruism and as well as effects for race and gender.

dc_type

text

dc_publisher

DigitalCommons@Hamline

dc_format

application/pdf

dc_source

Departmental Honors Project

Download

Share

COinS